WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court majority ruled Tuesday that all demographic disparity data qualifies as non-justiciable abstract art, making it inadmissible in discrimination cases. Justices argued charts showing unequal outcomes lack specific intent. "We cannot adjudicate feelings represented by bar graphs," said Court Spokesman William Miller. Civil rights filings dropped to zero immediately.
⚠️ Satirical article. Expert quotes are fictional.

Supreme Court Rules Statistical Evidence Of Racism Qualifies As Abstract Art
Expert Weighs In
“We cannot adjudicate feelings represented by bar graphs”
⚠️ Satirical article. Expert quotes are fictional.


